Covenant headroom
- EBITDA GBP 35,720,000 · Net debt GBP 100,000,000 · Headroom GBP 7,160,000 · Leverage 3 times.
Executive Intelligence · Capital Allocation and Investments
Cash availability and funding need over a horizon from verified balances and obligations.
Demonstration: Wexcombe Retail Group (fictional) · Retail. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
Does our plan leave enough headroom against the borrowing covenants over the next year, and what would eat it?
Change the assumptions. Every result and the answer below are recomputed from them, and a warning appears when a result crosses a stated limit.
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
Sales change moves EBITDA through the margin on each point [S1]; extra spend adds to debt. Together they set how far the group is from the 3.0 times limit [S2]. The ratio is shown to the nearest whole number here; the covenant test uses the agreement's precise definition.
A falling-sales scenario with an unavoidable spend programme is the combination that breaches, and the treasurer should know it before the lender asks. The conversation to have early is about the definition, the cure rights and a waiver, not about hoping.
Relies on: S1 · Forecast, next twelve monthsS2 · Facility agreement, financial covenants
No approval is needed for this result: it is read-only insight, and nothing consequential happens because of it.
The Executive Intelligence story · This capability in the full register