Plan readiness
- Readiness 52.4% against 90%.
- Resolved in this review: 0 sections, 0 reconciled.
Executive Intelligence · Corporate Strategy and Growth
A planning workspace for objectives, assumptions, initiatives, owners and review dates, as recorded by people.
Demonstration: Halden Hospitals Group (fictional) · Healthcare. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
Is our five-year strategic plan ready for the board's challenge, and what is missing?
Resolve what is missing or out of date. Evidence counts only when it is attached, or when its owner confirms it is current; the sign-off needs the stated completeness.
52.4% complete · 90% needed
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
Foundations, risks and delivery owners are in place [S1][S2]. Three gaps would invite the board's first questions: a capital plan out of step with the demand case, no record of the alternatives considered, and a workforce annex that is only a placeholder.
The alternatives section matters most for the board's confidence: a plan that does not say what else was considered looks like a conclusion in search of an argument. 3 remain open (Capacity and capital plan consistent with the demand case; Alternatives considered and reasons for rejecting them; Workforce plan matched to the clinical model).
Relies on: S1 · Plan draft v6 indexS2 · Board planning checklist
The chief strategy officer decides. Approving confirms the plan may go to the board for challenge. It does not approve the strategy.
Not ready to approve. Evidence is 52.4% complete; the sign-off needs 90%.
In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.
The Executive Intelligence story · This capability in the full register