Competitor briefing
- 0 statements; 0 labelled estimate or hearsay.
- Sources: 0.
Executive Intelligence · Corporate Strategy and Growth
Records competitor facts that a person enters with a source and a date, plus approved public-source feeds.
Demonstration: Pellam Diagnostics Ltd (fictional) · Medical devices. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
What can we say about the competitor with evidence, and what are we only repeating?
Choose which statements go into the brief. A statement with no source is refused; each one you include carries its sources with it.
Choose the statements to include. Each one carries its sources into the brief.
0 of 6 statements included · 2 held back for lack of a source.
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
The briefing states what the competitor itself has published and what follows from its accounts [S1][S2]. The sales team's report of approaches is labelled as hearsay and as an estimate [S3].
Two popular claims, a price 20% below ours and the abandonment of the older line, have no source at all and are not repeated. Repeating a rumour in an internal briefing gives it a status it has not earned.
Relies on: S1 · Competitor press release, 3 OctS2 · Competitor annual reportS3 · Sales field notes (unverified)
The head of competitive intelligence decides. Approving releases the briefing to sales leadership. It does not change pricing or any commitment.
Not ready to approve. Choose at least one supported statement for the brief first.
In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.
The Executive Intelligence story · This capability in the full register