Pricing roadmap, next quarter
- First: Raise list price 3% on the long tail of products.
- The order is sensitive to: none of the tested weightings.
Financial Intelligence
Revenue leaks quietly, and it is hard to see which customers, products or sites actually make money.
Demonstration: Brightwater Software (fictional) · Software. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
Which pricing action should we take first, given what we care about?
Change how much each criterion matters. The ranking is recomputed, and the page tells you whether the leader would survive a different judgement.
Leader's margin over the next option: 0.33. The leader holds under every weighting tested.
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
The ranking depends on what the leadership team values. The order is holds under the weightings tested; the leader would change if none of the tested weightings [S1][S2][S3].
A weighted score is a way to make a judgement explicit, not to replace it. The lead over the next option is 0.33 on a five-point scale, which is small enough that the team should discuss the top two before committing.
Relies on: S1 · Revenue and margin by productS2 · Discount history by deal sizeS3 · Renewal and churn summary
The CCO and the CFO decides. Approving the ranking records which action leads the pricing roadmap this quarter. It does not change any price.
Ready for the reviewer.
In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.
The Financial Intelligence story · This capability in the full register