Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Financial Intelligence

Financial governance

Cash, risk and unusual transactions are watched by different people with different tools, and action is slow.

Demonstration: Fairholme Holdings (fictional) · Diversified holding company. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Fairholme Holdings (fictional)
Who is asking
Group financial controller
Industry
Diversified holding company
What happened
External auditors will test segregation of duties and delegated authority on payments, and the controller wants to find exceptions first.

The question asked

Which payments broke our approval rules, and which have a recorded reason?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Payments with approvers exportRequester, approver, limit and date.
  • Delegated authority table registerLimits by role and delegation dates.
  • Vendor master change log exportBank detail changes.
Reads
Payment lines, the people who requested and approved them, the authority table and the vendor change log.
Does not read
The bank account numbers themselves, or employee personal data.
Permission
Group finance and internal control read access.
Who sees it
The group controller, the audit committee and the external auditors, by request.

Try it

Review each flagged record: confirm it or dismiss it. The totals and the answer below follow your decisions.

PaymentPayeeRequested / approved byPayment (USD)FindingDecision
PAY-7101Calder PalletsA. Rowe / M. Sethi9,800MatchedNone needed
PAY-7118Orrin FilmsK. Lindqvist / K. Lindqvist18,400Requested and approved by the same person
PAY-7124Fenwick EnergyA. Rowe / M. Sethi14,230MatchedNone needed
PAY-7139Harrow LegalT. Barclay / J. Oduya61,000Approved above J. Oduya's 50,000 limit
PAY-7150Nettle & CoA. Rowe / M. Sethi7,250MatchedNone needed
PAY-7162Verity StudioT. Barclay / M. Sethi22,700Bank details changed two days before payment; no callback recorded
PAY-7171Hale CleaningA. Rowe / M. Sethi6,100MatchedNone needed
PAY-7188Studio NorthK. Lindqvist / T. Barclay31,900Approved after the payment date
Flagged
4 of 8 · USD 134,000
Control exception
0 · USD 0
Reason on record
0 · USD 0
Undecided
4 · USD 134,000

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

4 of 8 payments broke an approval rule, USD 134,000 in all.

Four different controls are involved: segregation of duties, delegated limits, vendor bank-detail changes and approval timing [S1][S2][S3]. They carry different risk. A change of bank details without a callback is the pattern that fraud usually follows and deserves first attention.

You have recorded 0 as control exceptions (USD 0) and 0 as having a reason on record (USD 0). 4 are undecided (USD 134,000).

Relies on: S1 · Payments with approvals, Q3 sampleS2 · Delegated authority tableS3 · Vendor master change log

Review and approval

The group financial controller decides. Approving the exception register adds the confirmed exceptions to the control-deficiency log for the auditors. It does not reverse a payment.

Not ready to approve. 4 flagged exceptions are still undecided. Confirm or dismiss each one first.

In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.

What it produces

registerDraft, not approved

Control exceptions register

  • 0 exceptions, USD 0 of payments.
  • 0 items with a reason on record, linked to the evidence.
evidenceDraft, not approved

Audit trail for the auditors

  • Each exception cites the rule it broke and the lines it was found in.

Limits of this example

  • An exception is an observation against the rule as written; the reason for a delegation may exist outside the data.
  • The sample shown is illustrative; a real run covers the whole population.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.