Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Global Compliance

People, sector and international duties

Employment, privacy, security, environmental and cross-border duties sit with different teams and are rarely seen together.

Demonstration: Brightwater Care Services (fictional) · Social care across three countries. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Brightwater Care Services (fictional)
Who is asking
Head of people compliance
Industry
Social care across three countries
What happened
Each country has different mandatory training and right-to-work duties, and an inspection is announced for one of them.

The question asked

Is our evidence of people and sector duties complete enough for the inspection in the northern country?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Training and eligibility records (summary) exportCompletion status by duty, not individuals.
  • Sector duty list registerDuties by country.
Reads
Summary status by duty and country.
Does not read
Individuals' records, health data or immigration documents.
Permission
People compliance read access to summaries.
Who sees it
The head of people compliance and the country managers.

Try it

Resolve what is missing or out of date. Evidence counts only when it is attached, or when its owner confirms it is current; the sign-off needs the stated completeness.

Training

  • Safeguarding training completed by all care staff Present98% completed; exceptions recorded
  • Medication handling refresher in the last 12 months StaleRecords end at 14 months for one site

Eligibility

  • Right-to-work checks recorded for all hires PresentCheck log complete to last month
  • Professional registration checked annually MissingNo annual check recorded for two sites

Governance

  • Named registered manager for each location PresentAll locations assigned
  • Incident reporting procedure displayed and understood MissingAcknowledgements not collected

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

Evidence is 55% complete for the inspection; 90% is the target.

Three duty areas are evidenced: safeguarding training, right-to-work and registered managers [S1][S2]. Three are not: one site's medication refresher records are stale, professional registration checks are missing at two sites, and acknowledgements of the incident procedure were never collected.

3 still open (Medication handling refresher in the last 12 months; Professional registration checked annually; Incident reporting procedure displayed and understood). Evidence you resolve here is recorded as resolved by whom and when; it does not make the underlying duty met.

Relies on: S1 · Duty evidence summary, northern countryS2 · Sector duty list

Review and approval

The head of people compliance decides. Approving confirms the evidence pack for the inspection. It does not assert that every duty is met, only that the evidence is complete.

Not ready to approve. Evidence is 55% complete; the sign-off needs 90%.

In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.

What it produces

evidenceDraft, not approved

Inspection evidence pack

  • Completeness 55% against 90%.
  • Resolved in this review: 0 evidence items, 0 confirmations.

Limits of this example

  • Complete evidence is not the same as a duty well performed.
  • Summaries are used; an inspector may ask for individual records.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.

More in Global Compliance