Inspection evidence pack
- Completeness 55% against 90%.
- Resolved in this review: 0 evidence items, 0 confirmations.
Global Compliance
Employment, privacy, security, environmental and cross-border duties sit with different teams and are rarely seen together.
Demonstration: Brightwater Care Services (fictional) · Social care across three countries. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
Is our evidence of people and sector duties complete enough for the inspection in the northern country?
Resolve what is missing or out of date. Evidence counts only when it is attached, or when its owner confirms it is current; the sign-off needs the stated completeness.
55% complete · 90% needed
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
Three duty areas are evidenced: safeguarding training, right-to-work and registered managers [S1][S2]. Three are not: one site's medication refresher records are stale, professional registration checks are missing at two sites, and acknowledgements of the incident procedure were never collected.
3 still open (Medication handling refresher in the last 12 months; Professional registration checked annually; Incident reporting procedure displayed and understood). Evidence you resolve here is recorded as resolved by whom and when; it does not make the underlying duty met.
Relies on: S1 · Duty evidence summary, northern countryS2 · Sector duty list
The head of people compliance decides. Approving confirms the evidence pack for the inspection. It does not assert that every duty is met, only that the evidence is complete.
Not ready to approve. Evidence is 55% complete; the sign-off needs 90%.
In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.
The Global Compliance story · This capability in the full register