Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Global Compliance

Assurance and evidence

When an auditor or an inspector arrives, evidence has to be found in a hurry, and gaps appear for the first time.

Demonstration: Pinecrest Foods plc (fictional) · Food manufacturing. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Pinecrest Foods plc (fictional)
Who is asking
Head of assurance
Industry
Food manufacturing
What happened
The assurance team has tested a sample of food-safety records and must decide which results need a formal finding.

The question asked

Which sampled records failed their test, and which failures need a formal finding?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Assurance test sheet fileSampled records with the test applied.
  • Finding criteria documentWhat counts as a formal finding.
Reads
The sampled records' test outcomes and the criteria.
Does not read
Supplier commercial terms or employee data.
Permission
Assurance team's access to the test sheet.
Who sees it
The head of assurance and the quality director.

Try it

Review each flagged record: confirm it or dismiss it. The totals and the answer below follow your decisions.

RecordTest appliedSiteBatches affectedFindingDecision
CCP-0412Temperature log completeNorth12MatchedNone needed
CCP-0418Temperature log completeNorth12Four readings missing; no explanation recorded
CLN-0203Cleaning verified by a second personSouth8MatchedNone needed
CLN-0207Cleaning verified by a second personSouth8Verified by the same person who cleaned
ALG-0091Allergen changeover signedEast3Changeover signed after production restarted
TRC-0150Supplier certificate in dateEast20Certificate expired nine days earlier; deliveries accepted
TRC-0152Supplier certificate in dateNorth20MatchedNone needed
Flagged
4 of 7 · 43
Formal finding
0 · 0
Observation only
0 · 0
Undecided
4 · 43

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

4 of 7 sampled records failed, touching 43 batches.

The failures are not equal: a missing temperature log and a self-verified cleaning record are control weaknesses, an allergen changeover signed late is a food-safety risk, and accepting deliveries on an expired certificate affects the most batches [S1][S2].

You have recorded 0 as formal findings (0 batches) and 0 as observations (0); 4 are undecided. The criteria set the threshold, but the call is a person's.

Relies on: S1 · Assurance test sheet, OctoberS2 · Finding criteria v2

Review and approval

The head of assurance decides. Approving issues the formal findings to the site owners with a due date for response. It does not recall a product or stop production.

Not ready to approve. 4 flagged samples are still undecided. Confirm or dismiss each one first.

In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.

What it produces

registerDraft, not approved

Findings register

  • Formal findings: 0, 0 batches in scope.
  • Observations recorded: 0.
evidenceDraft, not approved

Test evidence

  • Each finding cites the sampled record and the criterion applied.

Limits of this example

  • A sample says something about the records tested, not the whole population.
  • Whether a product was safe is outside this review.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.

More in Global Compliance