Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Legal Intelligence

Legal Notice Intelligence

Receives and classifies legal notices, extracts dates, identifies potential deadlines and prepares draft responses for counsel to approve.

Demonstration: Wexcombe Retail Group (fictional) · Retail. Fictional data and a scripted answer.

The situation

Organisation
Wexcombe Retail Group (fictional)
Who is asking
Litigation paralegal
Industry
Retail
What happened
A letter before action arrived this morning and the response window is short.

The question asked

What does this letter demand, by when, and what do we not yet know about it?

What it reads, and who can see the result

  • Letter before action documentThe letter as received, scanned and read.
  • Matter file registerWhether earlier correspondence exists.
Reads
The letter and the matter index entry.
Does not read
Other privileged advice on the matter.
Permission
The paralegal attaches the letter.
Who sees it
The litigation team and the general counsel.

Try it

Read each highlighted clause and accept it, reject it, or send it to counsel. A clause the analysis is unsure how to read cannot simply be accepted.

Letter before action, 11 pages (fictional) · 6 clauses read, 5 highlighted

  1. 1We act for Ms A. Forde in relation to an incident at your Bridgeford store on 4 March.

  2. 2Our client demands payment of 18,500 in compensation within fourteen days of the date of this letter.

    high risk Demand Reading clear

    Money demand with a 14-day deadline

    Obligation: The company to respond or pay (14 days from the letter's date)

  3. 3Failing a satisfactory response, proceedings will be issued without further notice.

    high risk Threatened action Reading clear

    Threat of proceedings without further notice

  4. 4You are put on notice to preserve all CCTV, incident reports and staff rosters for the relevant period.

    high risk Preservation Reading clear

    Preservation request: CCTV usually overwritten on a short cycle

    Obligation: The company preserve CCTV, reports and rosters (immediately)

  5. 5The letter is dated 'the 2nd instant'.

    medium risk Date Reading uncertain

    The date is ambiguous: the deadline depends on it

  6. 6Our client has suffered injury and loss, the particulars of which will be provided in due course.

    medium risk Particulars Reading uncertain

    No particulars supplied

Accepted
0 (0 obligations)
Rejected
0
With counsel
0
Undecided
5

The answer

Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.

5 points in the letter need a decision; 0 create obligations for the company.

Two obligations need action now whatever the merits: the fourteen-day response window and the request to preserve CCTV, which retail systems commonly overwrite within days [S1]. The preservation request should be acted on today, independently of how the claim is answered.

Two readings are uncertain and are not accepted automatically: the date of the letter, which sets the deadline, and the missing particulars of injury, which affect how the claim can be evaluated [S1][S2]. A lawyer must read both.

Relies on: S1 · Letter before action (fictional)S2 · Matter index

Review and approval

The head of litigation decides. Approving fixes the response plan: the obligations register and the items sent to counsel. It does not respond to the letter or admit anything.

Not ready to approve. 5 highlighted clauses are still undecided. Accept, reject or send each to counsel first.

In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.

What it produces

registerDraft, not approved

Immediate obligations

  • 0 obligations with owner and deadline from accepted clauses.
  • 0 point(s) with counsel.
recommendationDraft, not approved

Same-day actions

  • Issue a hold on CCTV and rosters.
  • Confirm the letter's date before calculating the deadline.

Limits of this example

  • The reading is an aid; counsel decides how to respond.
  • No deadline is calculated for a date the letter does not state clearly.
  • This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.