Obligations extracted
- 0 obligations from accepted clauses, each with party and trigger.
- Clauses with counsel: 0.
Legal Intelligence
Contract Intelligence
Extracts obligations, unusual clauses, renewals, liability, indemnity, pricing, confidentiality and data-processing exposure from contracts, compared against approved co…
Demonstration: Harrowgate Hospital Trust (fictional) · Healthcare. Fictional data and a scripted answer.
The situation
- Organisation
- Harrowgate Hospital Trust (fictional)
- Who is asking
- Contracts lawyer
- Industry
- Healthcare
- What happened
- A supplier of imaging equipment has sent its standard agreement and expects signature this week.
The question asked
What in this agreement is unusual or risky for us, and what does it oblige each side to do?
What it reads, and who can see the result
- Supplier agreement (draft) documentThe supplier's standard terms as received, in a word-processing file.
- Our contract playbook documentPositions the trust accepts or does not.
- Reads
- The agreement attached for review and the contract playbook.
- Does not read
- Other contracts with the supplier or any patient information.
- Permission
- The contracts lawyer attaches the document.
- Who sees it
- The contracts lawyer, the procurement lead and the general counsel.
Try it
Read each highlighted clause and accept it, reject it, or send it to counsel. A clause the analysis is unsure how to read cannot simply be accepted.
Equipment supply and maintenance agreement (draft) · 6 clauses read, 5 highlighted
1The Customer shall pay each invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt.
2The Supplier's total liability under this Agreement shall not exceed the fees paid in the preceding twelve months, including for loss of data.
high risk Liability Reading clear
Liability cap below the playbook minimum and it covers data loss
Obligation: Supplier is liable only up to twelve months of fees (throughout the term)
3This Agreement renews automatically for successive terms of three years unless terminated on notice.
medium risk Term Reading uncertain
Automatic three-year renewal
Obligation: Customer must give notice to stop renewal (before each term ends)
4Maintenance response times are as set out in the Service Schedule.
medium risk Service levels Reading uncertain
Refers to a Service Schedule that was not attached
5The Supplier may substitute equivalent components without notice.
medium risk Changes Reading clear
Unilateral substitution; 'equivalent' is not defined
6This Agreement is governed by the law of the Supplier's home jurisdiction.
medium risk Governing law Reading clear
Foreign governing law
- Accepted
- 0 (0 obligations)
- Rejected
- 0
- With counsel
- 0
- Undecided
- 5
The answer
Simulated answer. Written for this fictional case, not produced by a live model. Only the figures in it are computed, from what you decided above.
5 of 6 clauses are highlighted; you have accepted 0 and sent 0 to counsel.
The liability cap is the clause that matters most: it is below the minimum in our playbook and it extends to data loss [S1][S2]. The automatic three-year renewal creates an obligation to give notice, which the contracts register would need to track.
Two readings are uncertain: the renewal term depends on a notice mechanism the draft does not fully describe, and the maintenance clause points to a schedule that is not attached. Those cannot simply be accepted; they go to a lawyer. You have accepted 0 into the obligations register.
Relies on: S1 · Supplier agreement, draft v1S2 · Contract playbook, liability and term
Review and approval
The general counsel decides. Approving fixes the issues list that goes back to the supplier as proposed amendments. It does not sign, accept or reject the agreement.
Not ready to approve. 5 highlighted clauses are still undecided. Accept, reject or send each to counsel first.
In the product this is a different person with the right permission. Here you play that role to see the rule.
What it produces
Proposed amendments
- Raise the liability cap to the playbook minimum and carve data loss out of it.
- Obtain the Service Schedule before signature.
Limits of this example
- The reading of a clause is an aid to the lawyer who decides; an uncertain reading is never accepted automatically.
- Only the document supplied is read; a side letter would not be seen.
- This is a scripted demonstration on fictional data. No model was called and no real organisation, person or result is shown.
More in Legal Intelligence
- Global Legal ResearchResearch statutes, regulations, official decisions and legal developments by jurisdiction.
- Legal Applicability and ExposureDetermines which laws may apply from the entity, activity, contract, jurisdiction and legal triggers, and the exposure each implies.
- Internal Dispute and Grievance ManagementConfidential, separated management of internal grievances, investigations, escalation workflows and evidence access, with the investigator, the respondent and the compla…
- External Disputes and LitigationTracks notices, claims, cases, counsel, deadlines, court events, holds, settlement workflows and outcomes.
- Legal Notice IntelligenceReceives and classifies legal notices, extracts dates, identifies potential deadlines and prepares draft responses for counsel to approve.
- Regulatory and Legal Change ImpactConnects verified regulatory developments to the contracts, processes, policies, entities and obligations they affect, and opens a governed review.
- Employment and Labour LawRegional employment-law obligations, agreements, policy review and labour-compliance support, tied to the workforce records the organisation already keeps.
- Corporate and Board GovernanceResolutions, delegated authority, board records, approvals, statutory responsibilities and governance evidence, kept as versioned records.
The Legal Intelligence story · This capability in the full register